Note 18. Trade receivables
|
|
|
2017 |
2018 |
||||
|
|
|
Gross |
Allowance for bad debts |
Net carrying amount |
Gross |
Allowance for bad debts |
Net carrying amount |
Current receivables |
|
|
12,080 |
–100 |
11,980 |
13,251 |
–210 |
13,041 |
Past due receivables 0–3 months |
|
|
1,719 |
–23 |
1,696 |
2,070 |
–54 |
2,016 |
Past due receivables 4–12 months |
|
|
592 |
–172 |
420 |
673 |
–165 |
508 |
Past due receivables >12 months |
|
|
465 |
–429 |
36 |
450 |
–403 |
47 |
Group total |
|
|
14,856 |
–724 |
14,132 |
16,444 |
–832 |
15,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whereof discontinued operations |
|
|
–950 |
46 |
–904 |
–315 |
82 |
–234 |
Continuing operations |
|
|
13,906 |
–678 |
13,228 |
16,129 |
–751 |
15,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
Current |
1–30 days past due |
31–60 days past due |
61–90 days past due |
91–180 days past due |
181–360 days past due |
More than 360 days past due |
Total |
Loss allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected loss rate, % |
0.5 |
1.8 |
5.0 |
16.1 |
16.2 |
45.5 |
90.2 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount – trade receivables |
12,375 |
1,595 |
496 |
257 |
308 |
219 |
480 |
15,730 |
Gross carrying amount – contract assets |
363 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
22 |
399 |
|
12,738 |
1,604 |
499 |
258 |
309 |
219 |
502 |
16,129 |
Loss allowance |
–59 |
–29 |
–25 |
–41 |
–50 |
–100 |
–447 |
–751 |
Carrying value |
12,679 |
1.575 |
474 |
217 |
259 |
119 |
55 |
15,378 |
Sandvik evaluates its trade receivables, contract assets and financial leases on a collective basis for its categories respectively. Each reporting entity groups its receivables in suitable risk categories according to Group policy. The Group’s assessment is that the aggregated credit risk has not increased during the reporting period.
Sandvik’s principles for the writing off of receivables are based on several prerequisites, such as proof of write-off, insolvency or failed legal and other collection processes. An assessment is made whether one or several of these prerequisites are fulfilled before the write-off takes place.
Credit risks are classified based on credit information provided by credit agencies, identified payment behavior of the customer and other relevant information available, such as lost contracts, changes in company management and other customer specific information. Additionally, a macro economic evaluation is conducted of the outlook of industries and countries relevant for our customers.
As regards credit securities, the Group selectively utilizes different forms of credit securities, such as letters of credit, retention of title or credit insurance.